Intron-rich dinoflagellate genomes driven by Introner transposable elements of unprecedented diversity.

Spliceosomal introns, which interrupt nuclear genes, are ubiquitous features of eukaryotic nuclear genes.1 Spliceosomal intron evolution is complex, with different lineages ranging from virtually zero to thousands of newly created introns.2,3,4,5 This punctate phylogenetic distribution could be explained if intron creation is driven by specialized transposable elements ("Introners"), with Introner-containing lineages undergoing frequent intron gain.6,7,8,9,10 Fragmentation of nuclear genes by spliceosomal introns reaches its apex in dinoflagellates, which have some twenty introns per gene11,12; however, little is known about dinoflagellate intron evolution. We reconstructed intron evolution in five dinoflagellate genomes, revealing a dynamic history of intron gain. We find evidence for historical creation of introns in all five species and identify recently active Introners in 4/5 studied species. In one species, Polarella glacialis, we find an unprecedented diversity of Introners, with recent Introner insertion leading to creation of some 12,253 introns, and with 15 separate families of Introners accounting for at least 100 introns each. These Introner families show diverse mechanisms of moblization and intron creation. Comparison within and between Introner families provides evidence that biases in the so-called intron phase, intron position relative to codon periodicity, could be driven by Introner insertion site requirements.9,13,14 Finally, we report additional transformations of the spliceosomal system in dinoflagellates, including widespread loss of ancestral introns, and novelties of tolerated and favored donor sequence motifs. These results reveal unappreciated diversity of intron-creating elements and spliceosomal evolutionary capacity and highlight the complex evolutionary dependencies shaping genome structures.

Coupling of spliceosome complexity to intron diversity.

We determined that over 40 spliceosomal proteins are conserved between many fungal species and humans but were lost during the evolution of S. cerevisiae, an intron-poor yeast with unusually rigid splicing signals. We analyzed null mutations in a subset of these factors, most of which had not been investigated previously, in the intron-rich yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. We found they govern splicing efficiency of introns with divergent spacing between intron elements. Importantly, most of these factors also suppress usage of weak nearby cryptic/alternative splice sites. Among these, orthologs of GPATCH1 and the helicase DHX35 display correlated functional signatures and copurify with each other as well as components of catalytically active spliceosomes, identifying a conserved G patch/helicase pair that promotes splicing fidelity. We propose that a significant fraction of spliceosomal proteins in humans and most eukaryotes are involved in limiting splicing errors, potentially through kinetic proofreading mechanisms, thereby enabling greater intron diversity.

Molecular Evolution: RNA Splicing Machinery Moonlights in Junk Removal.

A close relative of vertebrates solves the problem of gene-disrupting transposable element insertions by splicing them out at the RNA level. Why is such an elegant solution so rare across eukaryotes?

Patterns of conservation of spliceosomal intron structures and spliceosome divergence in representatives of the diplomonad and parabasalid lineages.

BACKGROUND: Two spliceosomal intron types co-exist in eukaryotic precursor mRNAs and are excised by distinct U2-dependent and U12-dependent spliceosomes. In the diplomonad Giardia lamblia, small nuclear (sn) RNAs show hybrid characteristics of U2- and U12-dependent spliceosomal snRNAs and 5 of 11 identified remaining spliceosomal introns are trans-spliced. It is unknown whether unusual intron and spliceosome features are conserved in other diplomonads. RESULTS: We have identified spliceosomal introns, snRNAs and proteins from two additional diplomonads for which genome information is currently available, Spironucleus vortens and Spironucleus salmonicida, as well as relatives, including 6 verified cis-spliceosomal introns in S. vortens. Intron splicing signals are mostly conserved between the Spironucleus species and G. lamblia. Similar to 'long' G. lamblia introns, RNA secondary structural potential is evident for 'long' (> 50 nt) Spironucleus introns as well as introns identified in the parabasalid Trichomonas vaginalis. Base pairing within these introns is predicted to constrain spatial distances between splice junctions to similar distances seen in the shorter and uniformly-sized introns in these organisms. We find that several remaining Spironucleus spliceosomal introns are ancient. We identified a candidate U2 snRNA from S. vortens, and U2 and U5 snRNAs in S. salmonicida; cumulatively, illustrating significant snRNA differences within some diplomonads. Finally, we studied spliceosomal protein complements and find protein sets in Giardia, Spironucleus and Trepomonas sp. PC1 highly- reduced but well conserved across the clade, with between 44 and 62 out of 174 studied spliceosomal proteins detectable. Comparison with more distant relatives revealed a highly nested pattern, with the more intron-rich fornicate Kipferlia bialata retaining 87 total proteins including nearly all those observed in the diplomonad representatives, and the oxymonad Monocercomonoides retaining 115 total proteins including nearly all those observed in K. bialata. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons in diplomonad representatives and species of other closely-related metamonad groups indicates similar patterns of intron structural conservation and spliceosomal protein composition but significant divergence of snRNA structure in genomically-reduced species. Relative to other eukaryotes, loss of evolutionarily-conserved snRNA domains and common sets of spliceosomal proteins point to a more streamlined splicing mechanism, where intron sequences and structures may be functionally compensating for the minimalization of spliceosome components.